Thursday, September 9, 2010

Productivity

I'll try to make this as short as possible.
We dont need EVERYBODY to do something fewer ppl can do,
just because the more popular opinion is tht everybody must participate.
Thats just a waste of time.
Another view is tht participation is required for bonding.
This may be true, but bonding may be achieved by so many other ways,
& bonding is only necessary when bonding is desired, which isnt always the case.

Ex.
There's a class party on sunday.
So they need to clean up the classroom on saturday.
There's 40 students, & only 10 is needed to clean.
Doesnt mean ALL 40 stdnts must come on saturday just for the sake of it.
I mean its a SATURDAY.
If everybody has to participate,
then each stdnt have to come all the way to school,
on a saturday,
& only clean only a small part of the class,
& go back.
Thats just stupid to me.

If participation is REALLY required, then find some other way
to divide the task so that everybody can participate without wasting time.
If thats not possible, then too bad.
Just bond at the party itself.
If that really is the reason for the party, then it shouldnt be a problem.

It all comes down to PRODUCTIVITY vs BONDING.
Everybody participates in doing something that only a few is required to, to bond.
or
Only the required amount of ppl do it, but not all have participated, so they dont bond.

But. If the person doesnt want to bond in the 1st place, then how?

No comments:

Post a Comment